The Streetcar Conspiracy

The Streetcar Conspiracy

Removing the streetcar rail lines systems from major US cities was a conspiracy to force American consumers to purchase personal automobiles and local governments to switch to gas-powered buses as public transportation.

The concept of selling vehicles as "personal freedom devices" came about in the 1950s, following the effectiveness of the aforementioned corporate conspiracy.  It was only then that most ("nuclear") American families had cars they would allow their children to drive, as they were older models.

As an aside, I guess "nuclear family" just rolls off the tongue more easily than "Big Oil" family...  Speaking of, why is the logo for British Petroleum, or BP, an image of the sun and not a fucking dinosaur?

ANYwho, it was not until the 1980s that having more than one car per household became an American Standard (ahem) when both nuclear family parents were forced to hold down jobs due to stagnating wages and rising inflation -- caused by yet another fiscal conspiracy:

Nixon's 1971 decision to drop The Gold Standard.  The majority of Americans' Real Wages (wages after adjusting for inflation) have not increased since before 1980.

That's the thing about "conspiracy theories:"

Only Guilty Parties call them that.

© The Weirding, 2019

Starfish Prime, Dominic I and II: Fishbowl Films

Too few realize that the US military/political "electorate" and science-for-pay community are criminally insane -- they think they're "heroes" who are "just doing their job" through mass murder.  The Fishbowl series of nuclear explosions in outer space should change these peoples' minds, but probably won't.

In 1962, these "heroes" decided it was logical to set-off a series of atomic explosions in outer space, as well as within the Earth's atmosphere -- to, you know, find out what would happen if they did.  Probably a bit like stickin' a firecracker in a fishbowl, right?  That kind of "hold my beer Science" is bad enough but, when you're dealing with these pathological "heroes" and their G.O.D., it only ever gets worse:

Some evidence suggests that, by the time they were shooting the Fishbowl Films, the US had already established a military base on the moon.

Could it be that the Starfish Prime exercises, Dominic I and II, were designed to see what kind of atmospheric changes would take place if they repeatedly launched nuclear-powered, space-capable vehicles from the "Fishbowl" climate of Earth into outer space?

UPDATE:  Sorry the formatting for this is so wonky.  I'm trying a few things but I can't see exactly how they're going to look live until I publish them.  Thanks!

© The Weirding, 2019

PHOTO: Dropping Weaponized Pathogens on Civilians is Legal (The Chemtrails Conspiracy)

§1520a

Source - House.Gov.

I found this piece of CoIntelPro by a willing and useful idiot whose rap sheet is filled with lunatic, hardcore, "left-wing" conspiracy theories (such as that New York City is about to be swallowed by the ocean).  Despite a wealth of insults and deplorable search term phrases keyed to play in an echo chamber, his ardent anti-chemtrail "reporting" somehow missed 50 USC §1520a... and every other fact.

Between name-calling and fact-shaming, he begrudgingly admits that weather modification is real. But he assures anyone reading that -- should it ever be used -- it will only be for ethical reasons, like blocking sunlight (not blocking satellites, or communications, or transmissions, or spreading disease) because... "Climate Change."

Weather modification, such as cloud-seeding, has been in active use since at least the 1930s.  You can purchase live medical samples from The Rockefeller Foundation, or just join the military to get them (and everything else) free.

© The Weirding, 2018

Vast Cracks Found in Arctic

Canadian research teams unveiled evidence of giant cracks in the Arctic Shelf yesterday.

This is being hailed as dramatic evidence of the ice caps breaking apart. The cracks were part of a 10-mile network on Ward Hunt, the area's largest shelf. It indicates the individual pieces could float away at any time.

Last year, we brought you news about the Ayles Ice Island, which has since split into two pieces. These developments are part of an "emerging pattern" in the Arctic, which recent data suggests may have more to do with natural, biological factors than anything man-made.

© C Harris Lynn, 2008

Wetlands to Blame for Global Warming?

Biologists and researchers said that Arctic wetlands may have been to blame for recent global warming conditions.

A multitude of scenarios and theories were forwarded, all having to do with biological factors, as opposed to human ones, such as increased waste and a general lack of concern for the atmosphere. In particular, emissions from wetlands, the release of carbon dioxide from permafrost, and a release of methane from seawater. Most data suggests these effects are centralized to the Arctic region.

Of course, we should pull our own weight, but scientists say this indicates the recent climatic changes are biological in nature and will likely run their course without human intervention.

© C Harris Lynn, 2008

Climate Changes Endangering Birds

Climate changes have affected one-in-eight species of birds, according to a new global study.

Droughts and other extreme weather stresses key habitats and significantly threatens over 1000 avian species. Eight were put on the Critically Endangered list this year.

The list is compiled and reviewed every four years by Birdlife International, a conservation charity. Conservationists suggested we heed recent trends toward less carbon emissions and lessening our "carbon footprint." But though climate changes have been most important, other factors are also at-play.

For the full article, click here.

© C Harris Lynn, 2008

Pollution Leads to Pneumonia?

A new study found that areas with higher levels of pollution also tend to have higher rates of death from such illnesses and diseases as pneumonia, cancer, and COPD.

While the author warns that more research is necessary, he believes the study clearly shows "a strong correlation" between air pollution and respiratory illness.  Social factors, such as smoking and deprivation, also contribute, and the researchers could make no division between car pollution and other chemical components.

Areas with the most deaths had higher levels of pollution, generally related to auto exhaust.  Pneumonia tended to be the major cause of death in these areas.

© C Harris Lynn, 2008

Smoky Haze

When I woke up this morning, it looked overcast.   I couldn't tell if it was humidity or heat, but I didn't want to be out in the middle of it.  Needless to say, by a little after noon, I had to be.

The first thing I noticed when I left the house was the smell: Something was burning, but I couldn't tell what.  It smelled like paper burning or maybe garbage.  I was afraid because I live in an apartment complex, but I knew that there would at least be smoke alarms going off, if not any firetrucks in the parking lot.  I looked and looked, but it was obvious from the kids running around and people coming and going that nothing was going on around where I live, so I left.

The haze was everywhere.   I had to drive about 3-4 miles down the road to the store and the haze was all across the roads.  When I got to the store, the smoke was as far up and down the highway as I could see.  Making my purchase, I looked down at the newsstand and noticed on the front page of the local paper where an old gymnasium had burned to the ground.  I didn't look at the story too hard, but I immediately asked, "Is that where all this smoke came from?"

The woman's eyes lit up and she said, "No! They said on the Nashville radio station that it was being blown up this way from the wildfires in Georgia!"

I was a little stunned.  Georgia is at least 2-3 hours from here at the closest and I had no idea the fires were nearby!  The reports I'd heard had said they were between Florida and Georgia, which I assumed meant they were on the far side of the latter state, and that's quite a ways from here!

I guess I just didn't realize how great the fires were nor how far smoke could travel.   It really wakes you up to the whole global warming issue and puts a lot of other things into perspective, as well.

Everyone's so concerned with how technology and the Web have "made the world a smaller place," but something like this really reminds you that the world isn't an infinite landscape.  Of course, intellectually, we all know this, but emotionally, I think it's easy to forget just how small the world really is.  When you look at a map and see all the distant lands, all the countries you've never even heard of, all the places you'll never visit, everything seems so far away.

By late afternoon, the haze had cleared away and it no longer smelled of smoke, but the whole thing really set my little gerbil wheel in motion.

Scientists Land on Ice Island

Scientists, along with a BBC team, have landed on the Ayles Ice Island, a chunk of the Ayles Ice Shelf which broke away in 2005 and was only recently identified.  They went there to "tag" it with a monitor -- not unlike how wild animals are tagged -- so scientists can follow the Ice Island's movements in the Arctic.

It now floats about 400 miles from the North Pole in one of the fastest-warming regions of the Earth.  It broke from the Ayles Ice Shelf in less than an hour back in August 2005, registering with the force of a small earthquake.

Records show this region of the Arctic has lost as much as 90% of its ice in the last century.  The map of the Arctic will have to be redrawn.

American Ice Age?

Scientists have found evidence across North America suggesting there was some kind of cosmic explosion around 13,000 years ago which may have wiped-out the first Stone Age culture and created the Laurentide Ice sheet, which covered thousands of square miles of North America.

They think the explosion may have occurred in the atmosphere or the ice sheet may have erased the crater.  The evidence they do have will be revealed at a meeting in Mexico later this week, but includes the fact that layers of sediment in over 20 North American locations contain "exotic" materials, such as nanodiamonds, tiny spheres of glass and carbon, and levels of iridium too high to have come from Earth.  This would have brought about the period known as the Younger Dryas.

This event is thought to have caused the extinction of the giant land mammals, including the giant sloth and the woolly mammoth.

Fewer Leaves Led to Frogs' Decline

Now We Know What Happened to Pepe!

Scientists working in Costa Rica have come to a startling conclusion as to the decline of the frogs' species in the region after studying 35+ years' worth of data: Fewer leaves on the ground seem to be the cause.

A fungal infection was previously assumed to be the culprit, but scientists noticed that the population of lizards who were immune to the infection were also in decline.  Amphibians have declined by up to 75% since 1970, yet scientists insist there is no human cause-effect relationship -- such as the destruction of their habitat by encroaching industrial efforts.  This percentage in decline directly correlated with the decline in leaf litter on the ground, which provides the creatures with both food and shelter.

The new suspect?

Global warming.

UPDATE:  "Global Warming" or -- as we Old Folk were taught to call it --"The Greenhouse Effect," is a very real, and very direct, by-product of Industrial pollution -- specifically, fossil fuel consumption and the eradication of millions of miles of trees and foliage (especially in tropical rainforests, such as the Amazon).  The "Scientific Community" refuses to acknowledge this because they are intellectually dishonest, and corrupt to the core; they would rather soak-up "free" grant money (that we taxpayers are forced to provide to further such MISO) than stand-up to the corporate giants responsible.  The few who do often wind-up featured on this blog as dead or missing.

However, there are some (too few) within the scientific community who refuse to be terrorized into silence and submission.  They never receive "mainstream" coverage but, once again, they do receive coverage on The OddBlog.  Then they wind-up dead or missing (so we get two posts out of the deal).

Fewer leaves on the ground means fewer trees, not "Global Warming."  That's common sense -- which is why mainstream "scientists" can't seem to figure that out.  We hope they enjoy cashing the checks we (and the oil companies) provide. - 2018