Neptune, Vulcan, and Planet X

Neptune

Neptune was discovered on this day in 1846 though it is said that Galileo's calculations pinpointed it as early as the 17^th-Century.  Using the same methodology, scientists theorized another planet existed, as well, and named it "Vulcan."  While Vulcan's existence has never been confirmed, some still insist that it is hidden behind the Sun.

This "hidden planet" theory has since mutated into "Planet X," or "Planet 9," and features prominently in Doomsday scenarios, Flat-Earth MISOs (23/Isis), and books by Zecharia Sitchin.

© The Weirding, 2018-2019

Starfish Prime, Dominic I and II: Fishbowl Films

Too few realize that the US military/political "electorate" and science-for-pay community are criminally insane -- they think they're "heroes" who are "just doing their job" through mass murder.  The Fishbowl series of nuclear explosions in outer space should change these peoples' minds, but probably won't.

In 1962, these "heroes" decided it was logical to set-off a series of atomic explosions in outer space, as well as within the Earth's atmosphere -- to, you know, find out what would happen if they did.  Probably a bit like stickin' a firecracker in a fishbowl, right?  That kind of "hold my beer Science" is bad enough but, when you're dealing with these pathological "heroes" and their G.O.D., it only ever gets worse:

Some evidence suggests that, by the time they were shooting the Fishbowl Films, the US had already established a military base on the moon.

Could it be that the Starfish Prime exercises, Dominic I and II, were designed to see what kind of atmospheric changes would take place if they repeatedly launched nuclear-powered, space-capable vehicles from the "Fishbowl" climate of Earth into outer space?

UPDATE:  Sorry the formatting for this is so wonky.  I'm trying a few things but I can't see exactly how they're going to look live until I publish them.  Thanks!

© The Weirding, 2019

Project: Orion

Project: Orion

We have discussed the wide-ranging, far-reaching Orion Project here before.  This is one big, bad mama-jama of a proven (and ongoing) Conspiracy involving nuclear-powered rocket propulsion technology and space travel.

We are anything but a "Fake News" site; we have never once knowingly published false information, and are always justified by later "findings."  That we publish information these pernicious Actors do not want you to see delights us to no end, but we do not publish information we believe to be false.  We don't make any money here, so we don't do clickbait, either (probably should, though).

That we are in possession of such materials, allegedly "Classified" and otherwise, is their fucking problem.  #NeverForget, they aren't called "Conspiracy Hypotheses," and absolutely nothing we publish can possibly compromise "National Security."  Besides, we back-up what we cover with copious links to credible external sources.  Most of this information is freely and readily available, if you know where to look, and ad hominem attacks are their last resort before stooping to outright Censorship.  We're just offering our "analysis" of news items, and newsworthy people and events.  Haha.

Project: Orion itself is rife with disinformation campaigns, spread mostly by independent "Defense Contractors," NGOs, and governmental agencies (including "private" companies and entities under government contract) -- specifically in the UK, US, and the War Crime, ISrael -- involved in rocket propulsion and space-based technology, and university students in those, and related, fields.  It is also directly related to several other Conspiracies involving the US government and MISC (Military Industrial Security Complex), such as Project / Operation: Sunshine, Project: Chatter, Operation: Boot, Operation: Black and Blue, and Operation: Credible Threat.

These Conspiracies are proven; they are not theoretical.  Entire books have been written, documenting them in great detail.  This is not CNN or The Rachel Maddow Show.

When you suppress information, and are continually caught outright in boldfaced lies, you prove yourself untrustworthy, leaving people no choice but to try connecting the dots themselves, or "theorizing."  It is natural, and very healthy.  In fact, it's unavoidable (for humans), as the (human) brain tries to make sense of things because that's its job.

The only way to stop the "spread" of so-called "Conspiracy Theories" is for these bad actors to confess.  Unfortunately, these little firebugs are Untouchable and Unbreakable, and -- flatly (haha) -- belligerent to the point of hostility.  Given the importance of disinformation to espionage, it shows how bad these actors are at their jobs -- and just how quickly they turn to violence, intimidation and terrorism, and kidnapping.  And Arson.

Anyone who goes to such extreme lengths to silence critics and those who question them is absolutely Guilty.  As they turn up the heat (haha) on us and our service providers, we will match or exceed the pressure on them in kind.  We ain't Russia.  I hope everyone has their insurance paid-up, because these Girl Scouts are all too likely to shit the bed again.

Because they have already been found Guilty of a litany of crimes, and this is what they are covering-up.  They are the only ones spreading misinformation, engaging in Anti-Semitism and other acts of racism, and attempting to discredit and silence all who would hold them responsible for their escalating Terrorism and past crimes.  Including the Murders.

Disregard the fact that They have given literally everyone in the world Motive; focus on the fact that only They have the Means and Opportunity.  They have seen to it that literally no one else could do these things, legally or otherwise.  There are no other suspects.

We hope to scratch the surface of Project: Orion, Operation: Paperclip, and more in future posts, but I'm pretty sure an FBI agent posing as a delivery man dropped-off my package yesterday, so...

© The Weirding, 2019

In Defense of Newtonian Dynamics (MOND)

Whirlpool Galaxy M51

MOND, or Modified Newtonian Dynamics, is usually short-handed as an alternative theory to Dark Energy and Dark Matter (FLRW, or Concordance, Model).  While the latter is generally accepted as fact, and even taught in schools, few realize that there is absolutely no evidence that Dark Matter or Dark Energy exist!  The entire "proof" of those concepts lay in theoretical mathematical equations, and nowhere else.

The FLRW Model depends (more or less) on the argument that one cannot prove a negative -- that is, we cannot prove that Dark Energy and Dark Matter do not exist, so they could exist.  Accepting that much, if you then accept a lot of other supporting, yet also unproven, theories, the Concordance Model might be correct.

The primary motive behind this is to support the "Multiverse Theory," which is largely a hobbled-together hypothesis based on Schroedinger's Cat and Uncanny X-Men comics, stating (loosely) that there is an infinite number of universes in which all possibilities occur.  There are other reasons for the theories of Dark Energy and Matter, but the Multiverse Theory is what kicked it off and gave it traction.  Again, there is no way to disprove this, but there is absolutely no proof of it, either!

It's Faith-based Science on a universal scale.

We can see in large scale structures, such as forming galaxies and their collapse, the same patterns we see in cell formation, and the collapse and formation of cellular networks.  As numerous "spirituality"-based memes suggest, this is no coincidence -- and, in that at least (more usually, at most), they're correct.

The similarities do not end there; we have innumerable cases to which we can point in which small scale structures reflect large scale structures in both form and formation, and often degradation.  This appears to suggest that matter follows the same patterns during formation and dissolution, regardless of the structure's scale, and possibly regardless of atmospheric constraints -- such as a lack of oxygen, gravitational fields, et. al.

It is because of this, but not this alone, that I discount the FLRW Model in favor of MOND.

I am not suggesting that Dark Energy and Dark Matter conclusively do not exist, as a rule, nor even that a multiverse is impossible; I am saying their existence has yet to be proven, so we cannot take their existence on faith.  In fact, I willingly concede that "empty," or "Dark," space likely has some measurable weight, even if only at a sub-atomic level.  This makes perfect sense, as we also know factually that many particles are too small to be seen with the naked eye or even powerful devices, and these should then both occupy space and have measurable weight (if not mass) -- but the leap in logic from that concession to the Concordance Model is pure fantasy.

The processes we have observed appear to closely follow Newtonian Principles, with some forgiveness for atmospheric conditions, including the weight of "empty" space, so this is a more provable -- and more viable -- theory than the FLRW Model.  In fact, you have to accept a byzantine structure of auxiliary theories to even make the mathematical gymnastics of the FLRW Model work!

Until there is a functional way to literally prove the existence of Dark Energy and Dark Matter and/or the existence of a multiverse, it's detrimental to teach it to children, and it's astounding that it has found such wide acceptance in the scientific community -- especially in such a short time.

This is a case-in-point as to why so many question the "Religion of Science" -- and a damn good one, IMO!

As I favor the theory of Mu/Pangaea over the more accepted, but also thoroughly lacking, theories concerning disappearing isthmuses, I favor MOND over FLRW.  Just because you cannot prove a negative does not mean any fantastic theory need be entertained, especially at the scientific level.  And, since the Concordance Model fails to meet the Scientific Method, it should never have been accepted as anything more than the less preferred theory -- particularly when compared to Modified Newtonian Dynamics.

© The Weirding, 2018

VIDEO: STS-75 Tether Incident - UFO / OVNI (NASA)

The STS-75 Tether Incident

NASA (US) STS-75 Tether Incident UFO OVNI video footage with alleged NASA commentary.

Note that several instances of this video exist showing the same footage, but with different commentary.  I have seen the "official" NASA version, in which the commentator expresses the notion, 'Well, I guess that answers The Question' (assumed to be in reference to whether or not there is life beyond Earth [as private companies, military, and criminal organizations also possess such technology]), but I cannot confirm the veracity of this video's commentary -- especially with all the hijinks YouTube; Google, xxx; and ALPHABET, Inc. get up to.

© The Weirding, 2018

PHOTO: Zeta Reticuli Star Map

Zeta Reticuli Star Map

Star Map of Zeta Reticuli -- the likeliest to be inhabited planetary objects closest to Earth (about 57 light years away, IIRC).

© The Weirding, 2018

Watch Worlds in Collision: Immanuel Velikovsky Streaming Free

Velikovsky's Worlds in Collision

Immanuel Velikovsky is largely unknown today, though he rose to fame in the '60s and '70s for his 1950 work, Worlds in Collision.  A resurgence of casual interest in comparative mythology and Catastrophist theory in the 1970s was somewhat derisively termed Velikovskyism (it has also been applied to theories that attempt to rectify ancient tales and legends with scientific evidence).

The popularity of the questions he raised prompted inquiries by major scientific organizations, and became such a spectacle that it was its own scientific event, examined in "The Velikovsky Affair." Velikovsky's work and theories were vociferously mocked throughout the established scientific community well into the mid-1980s, but supporters still exist despite his "debunking."

Immanuel Velikovsky died in 1979, but the theories he proposed so captured the interest of both the public and the scientific community, that they continue to be debated.  Worlds in Collision remains a hot topic in some discussions.

Many of Immanuel Velikovsky's unpublished works are also available online.

© The Weirding, 2016

Large Hadron Collider Sabotaging Itself? From the Future!?

Two physicists working on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) have developed a theory that the Higgs boson, or "God particle," may well be sabotaging itself... from the future! According to the two, the Higgs boson may be "so abhorrent to nature" that nature is "rippling back through time" to sabotage the LHC before the machine can create one.

The papers have been published online and a recent article in The New York Times explained that while there would be a paradox if one went back in time and killed one's own grandfather, there would be no paradox if one traveled back through time and stopped one's grandfather from, say, being hit by a bus. Thus, nature may be keeping the LHC from starting so that it can never create the Higgs boson. One of the writers told the NYT that, in effect, "...we have a model for God."

The LHC was set to start in 2008, but it overheated. It is rescheduled to start-up this December, but many have questioned the safety of an atom-crushing machine. Foremost in their reported fears is creating a black hole on Earth which will destroy the planet and everything on it.

More than one wry commenter has noted the LHC will eventually work... in 2012 (the year the Mayan Calendar posits for the end of the world).

© C Harris Lynn, 2009

Echoes of Ancient Supernova

In the year 1572, a new heavenly body appeared in the sky, shattering astronomers' (astrologers', actually) notions of the universe. The star appeared in the constellation Cassiopeia and was even visible during the day. Danish skygazer, Tycho Brahe, recorded the event in his book, Stella Nova. Its appearance challenged the idea that stars were unchangeable - a notion which was forwarded by Aristotle and his acolytes and dominated Western thought. Now scientists have uncovered "fossil evidence" of the supernova Brahe first observed and recorded.

Using telescopes in Hawaii and Spain, scientists picked up echoes from the supernova reflected by interstellar dust. The debris has expanded over the years into a cloud of dust approximately 20 light years in diameter. Brahe recorded the first light wave to pass Earth, but even today, light waves from the explosion reach us. These "echoes" create what are essentially fossil imprints which allow researchers to reconstruct the original explosion.

The BBC has more information on this discovery, along with video.

© C Harris Lynn, 2008

Meteorite Impact Discovered in Scotland

Researchers believe they have discovered the site where a crater may have hit the Scotland Isles some 1.2 billion years ago.

Unexplained rock formations in the area were previously thought to have been caused by volcanic activity, but the lack of a volcano puzzled investigators. Clinical analysis of some of the surrounding rock discovered the presence of the element, iridium, most often associated with extra-terrestrial activity. 

While collecting the evidence was an arduous and time-consuming task, researchers eventually came to the conclusion that the all the baffling evidence could mean only one thing: A meteorite struck the British Isles a little over a billion years ago!

The only other impact site in the area lay beneath the sea, and many question its origins.

© C Harris Lynn, 2008

Great Cosmic Nothingness

As I have said before, I simply do not know that much about Astrophysics, Astronomy, and all of that stuff. I can generally follow along up to a point, but beyond that, it is literally over my head (no pun intended).

The other day, scientists claimed to have discovered The Great Cosmic Nothingness - whatever the hell that means - a space where nothing exists, literally. No matter, no antimatter, just... nothing. Nothing, as Descartes might put it.

What does this mean? Are there any sorts of repercussions or possibilities or anything to conclude from this? I haven't the foggiest. But I figured I would include the link to the article in case some of you bright minds had missed it. I'm sure most of you can make more sense of it than I can!

One Dead Star

Ah, Astrophysics. Infinitely fascinating, but I would so be lying if I said I understood much of it.

Scientists have discovered what they call a "neutron star" high above our galaxy, which they have named Calvera. They are uncertain what kind of neutron star it is. As one scientist puts it, "Either Calvera is an unusual example of a known type of neutron star, or it is some new type of neutron star, the first of its kind." There are seven other known neutron stars, which are often called The Magnificent Seven within the scientific community. Calvera was the name of the villain in said movie.

A neutron star is apparently a heavenly body which has gone supernova some time in the past and lost their outer layers, forming a supernova remnant. The center of the star collapses under gravity, causing protons and electrons to form neutrons - hence the name.

I could go on and on, but like I said, I don't know much about this stuff, so I'll refer you instead to the BBC article.